Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade tapioca from 0.11.16 to 0.11.17 #167

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bannable
Copy link
Owner

@bannable bannable commented Mar 2, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `rubygems` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • Gemfile
⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the Gemfile.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 591/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.1
Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-RUBY-YARD-6305193
No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Cross-site Scripting (XSS)

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-YARD-6305193
@bannable bannable closed this Apr 6, 2024
@bannable bannable deleted the snyk-fix-bd7d2eb0fd1a3165719e2d02f28f2f04 branch April 6, 2024 06:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants